Anthony List (SBA List), and CLI, clarifies that “certain types of providers” is a “euphemistic way of referring to elective abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood Federation of America affiliates.” In the comment, ADF, SBA List, and CLI maintain that the proposed rule “contradicts the letter and spirit of Title X not to subsidize elective abortion, and runs contrary to the right of States in our federal system to optimize health care for women.”īecause FQHCs and RHCs provide primary preventive care and access to comprehensive diagnostic care, unlike boutique “reproductive healthcare providers,” prioritizing public healthcare funds to such entities is simply better fiscal healthcare policy. The first comment, filed jointly by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), Susan B. The proposed rule ( Compliance with Title X Requirements by Project Recipients in Selecting Subrecipients, 81 FR 61639-61646), which was published September 7, seeks to preclude states from taking action to “restrict participation by certain types of providers as subrecipients in the Title X Program…” On October 7, the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) filed two separate comments to the Department of Health and Human Services regarding its proposed rule on entities qualifying for the government’s Title X family planning funds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |